Aster vs Hyperliquid: which is better?
Here's how the two stack up. Trading volume isn't shown for either — DefiLlama's derivatives volume data requires a paid plan, so fees and revenue are the closest free proxy for usage.
| Hyperliquid | Aster | |
|---|---|---|
| Daily fee revenue | ~$4.14M | ~$161K |
| Daily protocol revenue | ~$3.32M | not reported |
| Category rank (by fees) | #1 perp DEX | #7 |
| Design | L1 blockchain + own EVM | perp DEX on BSC |
| Max leverage | high | up to 1001x (Simple Mode) |
| Backers | — | YZi Labs |
The honest bottom line: by usage they're not close. Hyperliquid takes in roughly 25× the daily fees of Aster — it's the dominant perpetual DEX by a wide margin, running on its own Layer 1 with a full EVM, spot trading, lending and RWA support. Aster is the smaller, newer entrant (backed by YZi Labs) that differentiates on accessibility: MEV-free, one-click trading with up to 1001x leverage in Simple Mode plus pro-grade tools in Pro Mode. If the question is "which is the bigger, more battle-tested platform," it's Hyperliquid decisively. If it's "which fits a specific trading style," Aster's edge is simplicity and extreme leverage — though 1001x is a volatility-magnifying feature, not a risk-free one.
Both links below are to the platforms themselves; neither is a recommendation to use one over the other. You can dig into Aster's card and mechanics here — AsterTrade Now. Hyperliquid isn't in our curated directory, so I can't show it a card, but its site is app.hyperliquid.xyz.
Also tracked: FomoDownload App,
LighterTrade Now,
GMTradeTrade Now,
edgeXTrade Now,
GMXTrade Now.
Generated August 26, 2026 byCoinAII — not financial advice.